1. Half term prep: Constitutional reform since 1997 has
not gone far enough. Discuss. (40)
In your groups - prepare a PowerPoint presentation using the hand-out & textbook for the first lesson after half term. Email the completed presentations to Mr Thomas or save it to a usb. The group tasks are;
2.Constitutional reform presentations
Group
1 - HRA
- Why was the HRA proposed?
How
does
it work? The
HRAin context.
Group
2 -
Parliament (the
Commons & the Lords)
Group
3 – Electoral
reform -
Changes, the 2011 referendum etc
Group 4 – The Freedom of information Act – what is it & how does it work?
Group 5 – Devolution – What is it? How does it work? Also, could it be described as ‘quasi
federalism’?
Group 6 – Constitutional
reform under Brown, Cameron & Clegg.
Upper 6th form
1. Half term prep: To what extent have conservatives
supported ‘free
market’ capitalism?(45)
2. Reading (with notes) to be completed for the first class after half term
Introduction to New Right
1. What does the term ‘New Right’ describe? What is
it a marriage between?
2. How is it a restatement of the
case for a minimal state?
3.Why was government the cause of the
problems the economy faced?
4.How &why do they support the
‘supply side’? 5.In what ways is it anti-statist & why do they oppose welfare?
Owen Jones looks behind the scenes of the Jeremy Corbyn Labour leadership campaign. From barely making it on to the ballot paper, to Corbyn becoming the party's new leader with the biggest percentage in history.
Shadow business secretary, & shadow first secretary of state - Angela Eagle
Chief whip - Rosie Winterton
Shadow health secretary - Heidi Alexander
Shadow justice secretary - Lord Falconer
Shadow leader of the Commons - Chris Bryant
Shadow international development secretary - Diane Abbott
Shadow chief secretary to the Treasury - Seema Malhotra
Shadow Scottish secretary - Ian Murray
Shadow Northern Ireland secretary - Vernon Coaker
Yvette Cooper will chair Labour’s taskforce on refugees.
Michael Dugher is expected to become shadow culture secretary. There are also rumours about Owen Smith becoming shadow work and pensions secretary, and Gloria De Piero becoming shadow defence secretary.
The excellent Chris Mullin novel & TV drama ‘a very British coup.’ It is the story of Harry Perkins the radical left wing leader of the Labour party who becomes PM. This 1980's political thriller is well worth watching http://www.channel4.com/programmes/a-very-british-coup/on-demand/1867-001
Vote for the name for our new politics magazine by adding one of the choices into the comments box below using your politics nom de plume (U6/L6 email this to me if you haven't already)
1.Dissent
2.The Eagle 3. The Saint
4. Jacobin
5. Manifesto
6. Partisan
7. Insight
Other St John's Politics Society events this term
1. Debating Matters competition 30th September 4.45-8pm - PAC
2. Blair, Western intervention & the Stop the War coalition – Lindsey German (National Convener Stop the War)14th
October 5.30-7pm - The Old Chapel.
3. The revolutionary ideas of Karl Marx – Mark L Thomas
(leading Marxist, writer & activist) 11th November 5.30-7pm - MMS
4. Chris Grayling MP & Leader of the House of Commons - 20th
November 6pm - The Old Chapel
5. National Youth Parliament 'Make Your Mark' - End of September - Details to follow
Codified constitution - When did it originate,
how does it work, what types are there, what are the benefits & pitfalls?What are the main sources & characteristics of the UK constitution? Should the UK codify its constitution?Essential reading: Essentials of UK Politics, A Heywood, Pages
170-187
U6 Politics - Unit 3
1. Why
is individual freedom so important for liberals?
2. Define
individualism.
3. According
to Mill, on what grounds can the state rightfully constrain an individual’s
liberty?
4. How
do such libertarians view actions that are ‘self regarding’? Give examples.
5. What
does such a view imply about the liberty of others? (Rawls)
6. Describe Issiah Berlin’s ‘Two concepts of
liberty.’
7. Try
& explain how this relates to the question of the individual & the
state.(not in text)
8. What
was the main theme of the enlightenment?
9. Define
‘rationalism’. (See box on p.33)
10. How does
this relate to individual liberty? 11. How does this relate to progress?
While national elections were taking place on Thursday 7 May, pupils hurried to makeshift ballot boxes on the School’s quadrangle to vote for the party of their choice in the mock elections being held at St John’s. A full spectrum of political views was heard, with one pupil standing for each of the mainstream parties: UKIP, the Liberal Democrats, Labour, Conservatives and Green.
The previous days saw a flurry of activity around the School’s site. A TV-style live debate, chaired by Mr Lotsu, took place among the candidates on the Tuesday evening, flyers were distributed around the School’s Dining Hall the following day and on Wednesday afternoon hustings took place in the Performing Arts Centre, attended by over 400 pupils.
During the TV-style debate, an audience of pupils typified the new generation of discerning voters, bombarding candidates with questions: What was their position on leaving the EU? How did they view austerity? How they would attack climate change? What was their stance on gender inequality? In a debate characterised by heckling and humour, the five pupils under the spotlight demonstrated their developing political astuteness, answering some questions well and skilfully sidestepping others.
Once the mock polling stations had closed on Thursday afternoon the ballots were counted. The final results were as follows:
Liberal Democrats: Alex Webb (Lower Sixth, West House) - 326 votes UKIP: Will Genzel (Upper Sixth, Churchill House) - 90 votes Conservatives: Will Laver (Lower Sixth, Surrey House) - 63 votes Labour: Sam Thornton (Lower Sixth, Churchill House) - 41 votes Greens: Rebecca Floyd (Lower Sixth, Haslewood House) - 31 votes
TURNOUT: 90%
All candidates should be congratulated on their involvement, but so too should the other pupils. Perhaps the most important result, then, is the last one. Comments from leading politicians at the time of the last general election expressed dismay that young people did not show an interest in politics. This final statistic shows that, at St John’s, quite the opposite is true.
St John's Question Time, which was held on
Tuesday evening, appears to promise an exciting election this week, with all
candidates making strong appearances. The usual heckling was seen, with all
parties attacking each other whenever possible, admittedly rather well at
times. Convincing points by one candidate were swiftly ripped apart by a rival,
often UKIP, and so the evening went. A range of questions were posed to the
candidates, ranging from their views on leaving the EU, what they would do
about tuition fees, how they would attack climate change, their views on feminism
and gender inequality and how they viewed austerity. All parties answered
reasonably well, though sadly, in typical politician form, they avoided
answering questions for which they were not well informed, thus sidestepping
public embarrassment, much to the disappointment of the audience. Answers ranged from intelligent to puzzling
(in the case of the Liberal Democrats), but were overall insightful and eye
opening. The Greens ideas for gender equality and climate change were
interesting, though their plans on how to raise money for investment and
welfare were perhaps more so. Fair warning, if you are making more than £150,000 a year, prepare to be hit with the 60% tax. However their
policies on scrapping tuition fees
and holding banks to account for the deficit through the Robin hood tax are
definitely worth checking out.
Labour held strong, even under attack from both
UKIP and the Conservatives, though their failure to step away from their past
threatens to damage their campaign. Mr Thornton will need to separate himself
from his predecessors, as the evening showed that all the while Blair and Brown’s mistakes are kept alive in the minds of
voters,Thornton doesn't stand a chance. If he does in fact manage to distance
himself from the calamities of the past he may do better than expected, as the
debate illustrated a strong candidate who understands his party’s aims, which is more than can be said for
Mr Webb. While the Liberal Democrats were able to answer some questions
successfully, on the whole Mr Webb relied too heavily on merely attacking his
rivals and I left the evening unsure as to what most of his comments even
meant. In comparison the Conservatives were reasonable, however Mr Laver seemed
nervous, and should aim to improve his verbal skill. Regardless, the points that
Mr Laver made were successfully damaging, and with the facts and figures he provided,
Conservatives appeared to have a safe but promising economic policy.
Undoubtedly the candidate who stood out among
the parties last night was UKIP’s
Will Genzel, though if this was due to his constant interruptions and
argumentative state, or his original if not bemusing comments, I could’t tell you. He balanced sensible and
impressive answers on tuition, austerity and the EU with bizarre views on
feminism and climate change. Puzzling and yet hilarious, Mr Genzel undoubtedly
beat Mr Lotsu’s comedy by denying
the very existence of global warming. According to Mr Genzel it is all a natural
change and the evidence proving we are damaging our
environment is merely fiction, easily overlooked for the oh so reasonable ‘evidence’proving we’re not. While amusing, I couldn’t help but also find this a rather concerning statement, and
wondered if Mr Genzel had been speaking to his fellow UKIP member who claimed
the floods back in 2014 were due to legalising gay marriage. Overall the
evening was very informative, with each party showing a particular strength
with certain topics. While some parties undoubtedly stood out due to
performance and presentation, the ultimate decision will be based on substance
and it will certainly be interesting to see which parties hold up under the spotlight.